About
    Mission and Values
    Our Staff
    Our Board
    Who Are ASAP’s Members?
    Jobs and Internships
    Get Newsletter
    Media
    Press
    Press Releases
    Policy Priorities
    Policy Actions
    Resources for Attorneys
    Work Permits
    Common Work Permit Questions
    How to Apply for a Work Permit
    The CASA Lawsuit
    The Tony N. Lawsuit
    Become a Member
    Members
    Become a Member
    Check Membership Status
    View Membership Card
    Who Are ASAP's Members?
    Questions About ASAP Membership
    Help
    Donate

    Search

Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project (ASAP)

  • About
    • Mission and Values
    • Our Staff
    • Our Board
    • Who Are ASAP’s Members?
    • Jobs and Internships
    • Get Newsletter
  • Media
    • Press
    • Press Releases
    • Policy Priorities
    • Policy Actions
    • Resources for Attorneys
  • Work Permits
    • Common Work Permit Questions
    • How to Apply for a Work Permit
    • The CASA Lawsuit
    • The Tony N. Lawsuit
    • Become a Member
  • Members
    • Become a Member
    • Check Membership Status
    • View Membership Card
    • Who Are ASAP’s Members?
    • Questions About ASAP Membership
  • Help
  • Donate

Rodriguez Alvarado v. United States

On August 17, 2016, ASAP filed a first-of-its-kind federal lawsuit against U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on behalf of Suny Rodriguez and her minor son. The lawsuit sought monetary damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) for the mistreatment that Suny and her son suffered while imprisoned in border detention facilities, including inhumane conditions, threats of family separation, and coercive tactics pressuring them to abandon their legitimate asylum claims.

The government argued that the case should be moved to Texas, but the judge denied the government’s motion on May 25, 2017, allowing Suny to fight her case in the state she calls home. After months of written discovery and depositions, the parties settled the case for $125,000. The federal judge approved the settlement on February 22, 2019.

This was the first lawsuit of its kind to seek monetary damages on behalf of asylum seekers who were subjected to family detention and separation. ASAP co-counseled the case with Gibbons P.C., the Worker and Immigrant Rights Advocacy Clinic at Yale Law School, and Elora Mukherjee of Columbia Law School’s Immigrants’ Rights Clinic.

Case Documents: 

  • Administrative Complaint
  • Federal Complaint
  • Government’s Motion to Dismiss or Transfer Venue to Texas
  • Opposition to the Government’s Motion to Dismiss or Transfer
  • Court’s Opinion Denying the Government’s Motion 
  • Argument for the Deposition of Former Acting ICE Director Thomas Homan* 
  • Final Settlement Agreement

Press: 

  • “How Families Separated at the Border Could Make the Government Pay” (New Yorker), translated into Spanish here.
  • “Migrant mother, son sue U.S. over treatment in detention” (Reuters)
  • “Expertos y activistas denuncian trato de México a migrantes centroamericanos” (Associated Press-Spanish)
  • “Rodriguez Alvarado v. U.S.” (New Jersey Law Journal)

*The parties reached a settlement agreement before the Court ruled on this discovery dispute.

If you are an advocate planning to file a damages lawsuit on behalf of an asylum seeker and would like to discuss this case further, please contact us at [email protected]

Join Us Here!

  • Donate
  • About
  • Press
  • Members
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2023 · Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project · Site by Ready to Blog Designs